A Look Back at History’s Finest
The Smith & Wesson Legacy
Smith & Wesson, a name synonymous with quality and innovation in the firearms industry, has a long and illustrious history. Their legacy is built on a foundation of groundbreaking designs and a commitment to excellence. The L-frame series, including the 686, was a significant step forward, addressing the need for a stronger, more robust .357 Magnum revolver. Introduced in 1980, the 686 quickly became a favorite among law enforcement, target shooters, and hunters. The design incorporated several important innovations, including the use of stainless steel, which provided superior corrosion resistance and a visually striking appearance. The L-frame itself offered a balance of size and strength, perfectly suited for handling the powerful .357 Magnum cartridge while remaining manageable for a wide range of shooters.
The Colt Python’s Storied Past
Colt, another giant in the firearms world, has a heritage of producing some of the most recognizable and admired firearms ever created. The Colt Python, launched in 1955, was conceived as Colt’s premium revolver, designed to be the finest production handgun available. Its sophisticated design and exceptional craftsmanship set it apart from its contemporaries. The Python quickly gained a reputation for its accuracy, smooth action, and stunning aesthetics. For many years, the Python was the standard against which all other revolvers were measured. However, the original production run was eventually discontinued, leaving a void in the market. The recent reintroduction of the Python, with updates to its design and manufacturing, brought the iconic name back into the hands of enthusiasts. The new iteration remains faithful to the spirit of the original while addressing some of the issues that contributed to the discontinuation of the earlier models.
Delving into Design and Features
The Smith & Wesson 686’s Design
The Smith & Wesson 686 boasts a sturdy and ergonomic design. The L-frame provides a comfortable grip for most shooters, and its weight, made from stainless steel, helps absorb recoil, making it manageable for extended shooting sessions. The barrel lengths offered vary, allowing for customization to suit different needs. Cylinder capacity is typically six or seven rounds depending on the specific model. The action is single/double, offering flexibility in how the gun is fired. Shooters can either manually cock the hammer for a lighter trigger pull in single-action mode or pull the trigger all the way through for double-action firing. The sights are designed for precision; they usually feature an adjustable rear sight and a fixed or interchangeable front sight, allowing shooters to fine-tune their point of aim.
The Colt Python’s Modern Design
The modern Colt Python retains the classic lines that made it famous but incorporates modern improvements. The frame, constructed from stainless steel, provides durability and a sleek finish. The barrel lengths available offer a variety of options for different shooting styles, from concealed carry to target practice. The cylinder holds six rounds. The action remains single/double, giving the shooter the choice of trigger pull types. The grips, available in various configurations, are designed to offer comfortable handling. The adjustable rear sight and front sight provide a clear sight picture and aid in accurate target acquisition. The reintroduction focuses on upholding the performance aspects that made the original Python so prized, while modernizing manufacturing techniques.
Comparing Design Elements
A clear understanding of the differences in design is crucial when choosing between these two revolvers. The Smith & Wesson 686, because of its L-frame, might feel slightly larger and heavier, a factor some shooters find beneficial for recoil absorption. It often features a higher cylinder capacity. The Colt Python often presents a more refined aesthetic, a hallmark of its original design. The choice between the two will depend on personal preferences related to size, weight, and aesthetic considerations. Both revolvers are built to last, but the slight differences in design can significantly impact how the gun feels in the hand and how it performs on the range.
Putting Performance to the Test
Accuracy Capabilities
Accuracy is a primary concern for any shooter, and both the Smith & Wesson 686 and the Colt Python are renowned for their precision. Accuracy is determined by a number of factors, including barrel quality, the sights, and the trigger pull. Both of these revolvers are designed with these aspects in mind. The 686, with its quality construction and adjustable sights, has consistently shown excellent accuracy potential in the hands of skilled shooters. The Python has a reputation for extraordinary accuracy, due in part to its meticulous manufacturing processes, precise barrel design, and smooth action.
The Trigger’s Influence
The trigger pull plays a vital role in accuracy. Both revolvers provide both single-action and double-action options. In single-action mode, the hammer is manually cocked, resulting in a lighter and crisper trigger pull. The double-action trigger pull is achieved by pulling the trigger through its full range of motion, which cocks and releases the hammer. The 686 typically features a smooth double-action trigger pull, while the Python’s trigger action has long been praised for its exceptional smoothness. These trigger characteristics are important for follow-up shots.
Recoil Management and Handling
Recoil and handling are also crucial aspects of performance. The weight of the Smith & Wesson 686 helps to absorb recoil, making it comfortable to shoot with .357 Magnum loads, although the snappy nature of the round is still evident. The Colt Python, with its refined design and often a slightly heavier feel, also handles recoil well, contributing to faster and more accurate follow-up shots. The ergonomics of both revolvers contribute to a secure and confident grip, allowing shooters to maintain control during rapid firing. These features translate into greater control and better shot placement for the shooter.
Reliability in the Field
Reliability is another key performance indicator. Both the Smith & Wesson 686 and the Colt Python are generally considered to be extremely reliable firearms. Smith & Wesson has earned a reputation for building durable revolvers that can withstand extensive use. The Colt Python, in its original and re-introduced forms, is known for its robust construction and generally trouble-free operation when properly maintained. However, it is important to keep any firearm well-lubricated and to follow recommended maintenance practices.
Understanding Ammunition Compatibility
Both the Smith & Wesson 686 and the Colt Python are chambered in .357 Magnum, a powerful cartridge that is versatile enough for a variety of uses. They can both also safely chamber and fire .38 Special ammunition, offering a more economical and lower-recoil option. When selecting ammunition, consider the bullet weight and type. The 686 and Python will handle a broad range of bullet weights, allowing shooters to tailor their ammunition to their specific needs. Users should always consult their firearm’s manual and only use ammunition that meets the manufacturer’s specifications. Using improper ammunition can negatively affect performance and may potentially damage the firearm.
Exploring Price and Availability
The cost of both the Smith & Wesson 686 and the Colt Python can vary depending on the condition of the firearm, its age, and its features. The Smith & Wesson 686 is widely available, with new models readily accessible through most gun stores and online retailers. Used examples of the 686 can be found at a more affordable price point. The re-introduced Colt Python also has good availability, although its price typically reflects its premium build and the Colt name.
The Collector’s Market
The original Colt Python has become a highly sought-after collector’s item. The price of these models can be exceptionally high, especially for examples in excellent condition. The collector’s value is an essential aspect to consider when assessing a firearm. The price and availability of each revolver have a significant impact on its overall value and its suitability for different buyers.
Making the Right Choice for Your Budget
A thorough cost-benefit analysis is critical. The Smith & Wesson 686, especially a used model, presents excellent value, offering a durable and accurate revolver at a reasonable price. The Colt Python, even with its higher price tag, may be a more enticing choice for those who value its iconic design and exceptional craftsmanship. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual priorities and budgets.
Weighing the Pros and Cons
Advantages of the S&W 686
The Smith & Wesson 686 has several advantages. It is generally more affordable, widely available, and known for its rugged reliability. The L-frame design provides a comfortable grip for many shooters. The robust construction makes it suitable for heavy use. Its stainless steel finish is corrosion-resistant and visually appealing. The drawbacks include a potentially larger size and weight compared to some other revolvers, and the perception by some that it lacks the prestige of the Colt Python.
Advantages of the Colt Python
The Colt Python’s advantages are numerous. It boasts an iconic design, exceptional craftsmanship, and often exhibits superior accuracy potential. The overall aesthetic appeal and the reputation for quality make it highly desirable for collectors. The disadvantages are mainly the higher price point, the potential scarcity of certain models, and the more complex mechanisms which may require specialized maintenance.
Choosing the Right Revolver
For Target Practice
The best revolver for you depends on your specific needs. For target shooting, accuracy, trigger pull, and ergonomics are key. Both revolvers are well-suited for target shooting, with the Python perhaps offering a slight edge in precision.
For Hunting Purposes
For hunting, stopping power and durability are paramount. Both are powerful enough, and the 686’s ruggedness might make it more appealing for harsh conditions.
For Personal Protection
For self-defense, reliability, ease of use, and concealability are crucial. Either option offers a reliable platform, though the 686, with its slightly larger size, might be slightly less ideal for concealed carry.
For Collectors
For collecting, the Colt Python is the clear choice, with its historical significance and collectibility.
Making the Final Decision
Ultimately, the best choice is one that resonates with your individual needs and preferences. If you’re looking for an accurate, reliable, and readily available workhorse, the Smith & Wesson 686 is a strong contender. If you value craftsmanship, historical significance, and stunning design, the Colt Python is an investment that you are likely to treasure.
Final Thoughts
Both the Smith & Wesson 686 and the Colt Python represent the pinnacle of revolver design. They have each contributed significantly to the history of firearms and continue to be revered by shooters worldwide. The 686 is a testament to engineering excellence, embodying reliability and practicality. The Python, with its elegance and accuracy, remains an icon of American gunmaking. These revolvers cater to distinct preferences, yet both represent excellence in their own right. The best way to decide between the two is to handle both, consider your primary use for the firearm, and determine which one best fits your shooting style and aesthetic sensibilities. Regardless of your choice, you’ll be joining the ranks of those who appreciate the legacy of these remarkable firearms.
