A Legacy Forged in Steel and Firepower
The Smith & Wesson legacy is built upon a foundation of innovation and reliability. For generations, the company has been a leader in the development and manufacture of revolvers, pistols, and other firearms. Their commitment to quality, durability, and innovation has made them a trusted name in the industry. These revolvers, designed to chamber the potent .357 Magnum round, quickly became favorites for law enforcement, sport shooting, and, importantly, personal defense. Their reputation for accuracy and reliability solidified their place as classics in the annals of firearms.
The introduction of the L-frame, where the 586 and 686 reside, was a pivotal moment. The L-frame was engineered to bridge the gap between the smaller, lighter K-frame and the larger, heavier N-frame. This innovative design allowed for a robust platform that could handle the stresses of the powerful .357 Magnum cartridge without sacrificing shootability and controllability. It offered a step up in durability while retaining the user-friendliness valued by many shooters. The L-frame quickly earned a reputation for being a “just-right” size and weight for the .357 magnum, offering excellent balance and comfortable handling.
The 586 and 686 are direct descendants of this heritage. They reflect the evolution of revolver design and are prime examples of Smith & Wesson’s dedication to producing quality firearms. They are more than just metal and wood; they are expressions of the company’s history.
Exploring the Heart of the Matter: Features and Specifications
The Material World: Frames and Finishes
The most immediately apparent difference between the Smith & Wesson 586 Vs 686 lies in their frames. The Model 586 boasts a frame crafted from blued carbon steel. This material gives the 586 a classic, elegant appearance. The deep, dark blue finish is undeniably attractive, and it harkens back to an era of classic firearms design. Blued carbon steel requires careful maintenance; it is susceptible to rust and corrosion if not properly cared for. This necessitates regular cleaning and oiling to preserve its finish and prevent degradation.
In contrast, the Model 686 flaunts a stainless steel frame. Stainless steel offers a significant advantage in terms of corrosion resistance. It is much more resistant to rust and environmental factors, making it an excellent choice for those who might be exposed to moisture or harsh conditions. The stainless steel finish typically has a matte appearance, although polished stainless steel options are available. The 686 requires less rigorous maintenance than the 586 in terms of rust prevention, but it still benefits from regular cleaning and care to maintain its functionality and appearance. The choice between carbon steel and stainless steel is often a matter of personal preference, factoring in considerations of appearance, maintenance needs, and anticipated use.
Chambers of Power: Caliber and Cylinder
Both the 586 and the 686 are chambered in the formidable .357 Magnum caliber. This cartridge is renowned for its power and versatility. The .357 Magnum offers significant stopping power and can be used effectively for a variety of purposes. Moreover, both revolvers are compatible with .38 Special ammunition, allowing shooters to choose a less powerful round for target practice or situations where less recoil is desirable.
The cylinders of these revolvers typically hold either six or seven rounds, depending on the specific model and configuration. The cylinder capacity affects the overall profile of the revolver and the number of rounds available before reloading is necessary.
Lines of Sight: Barrel Lengths and Accuracy
The 586 and 686 are available in a variety of barrel lengths, allowing shooters to choose the configuration that best suits their needs. Common barrel lengths include four-inch, six-inch, and even longer options. The barrel length influences several factors, including ballistics, sight radius, and handling characteristics.
A longer barrel generally results in increased muzzle velocity and improved accuracy at longer ranges. The longer sight radius (the distance between the front and rear sights) also contributes to enhanced accuracy. However, a longer barrel can also make the revolver less maneuverable and more difficult to conceal. Shorter barrels, while offering less ballistic performance, make the revolver more compact, lighter, and easier to carry.
Both revolvers feature adjustable sights, which allow shooters to fine-tune their point of impact for different ammunition types and shooting distances. These adjustable sights are a critical element in maximizing the accuracy potential of the revolvers. The quality of the sights and their adjustability directly impacts the shooter’s ability to achieve precise shot placement.
The Grip of Control: Grips and Ergonomics
The original factory grips on both the 586 and 686 have evolved over time. Smith & Wesson has used a variety of grip materials and designs, ranging from wood to rubber, designed to offer comfortable and secure handling.
Many owners customize their grips to optimize ergonomics and comfort. The wide availability of aftermarket grips provides a vast range of options, including grips that enhance recoil absorption, improve the shooter’s purchase, and add aesthetic appeal. The right grips can significantly impact the shooter’s ability to control the revolver effectively, particularly under the stress of rapid firing.
The Mechanics of Control: Trigger and Action
Both the 586 and 686 utilize a double-action/single-action (DA/SA) trigger mechanism. This mechanism allows the shooter to either manually cock the hammer for single-action fire (lighter trigger pull) or to simply pull the trigger for double-action fire (heavier trigger pull). The DA/SA action provides versatility, allowing for rapid firing in double-action mode or more precise shots in single-action mode.
The trigger pull weight and smoothness can vary between individual revolvers, but both models are generally known for their excellent triggers. The trigger pull is a crucial factor in accuracy. A smooth, consistent trigger pull allows for greater precision in shot placement. Over time, with proper use and maintenance, the trigger action of both models tends to smooth out.
Weight and Measure: Dimensions and Handling
The weight and dimensions of the 586 and 686 are similar, though the stainless steel of the 686 may give it a slightly heavier feel. These differences affect how the revolver handles, and its suitability for different uses. A heavier revolver tends to absorb recoil more effectively, while a lighter revolver is typically easier to carry concealed. The balance of the revolver is also influenced by weight, which affects how it handles.
The 586 and 686 generally have a balanced feel in the hand, offering good pointability and control. The choice between these models depends on factors such as the shooter’s build, strength, and intended use.
Performance and the Real World
The Impact of Force: Recoil Dynamics
The .357 Magnum cartridge packs a significant punch, and the recoil can be substantial. Both the 586 and 686 handle recoil relatively well, thanks to their weight and design. The weight of the frame, particularly the stainless steel in the 686, can help to mitigate felt recoil.
The grips play a crucial role in managing recoil, providing a comfortable and secure hold. The design and material of the grips can significantly influence how the recoil is absorbed and dispersed. Different ammunition types will also produce different levels of recoil, which should be considered when selecting these firearms.
Pinpoint Accuracy: Precision on the Range
Both the 586 and 686 are renowned for their accuracy. The adjustable sights and inherent design of the revolvers contribute to their precision. The quality of the trigger pull is also a major factor in accuracy. A smooth, consistent trigger pull enables shooters to place their shots accurately.
The shooter’s skill and the quality of the ammunition are also essential factors in accuracy. With practice and the right ammunition, both revolvers can achieve impressive groups at various ranges.
Trustworthiness in Action: Reliability and Maintenance
Both the 586 and 686 are known for their reliability. These revolvers are built to withstand the rigors of regular use. They are generally robust and dependable, requiring minimal maintenance to operate effectively.
Regular cleaning and lubrication are essential to maintain optimal performance. The stainless steel of the 686 offers an advantage in terms of corrosion resistance, but both models benefit from proper care. The robust design of these revolvers lends itself to many years of use with proper attention.
User Experience: Simplicity and Grace
Both revolvers are generally easy to use. Loading and unloading the cylinder is a straightforward process. The DA/SA trigger mechanism provides versatility. The controls are easy to access and operate. These firearms are user-friendly, making them suitable for shooters of all skill levels.
Weighing the Choices: Pros and Cons
The 586: Embracing the Classic
The 586, with its blued carbon steel frame, offers a classic aesthetic appeal. Its dark finish is attractive and evokes the heritage of the firearm. However, the blued finish is more susceptible to rust and corrosion, requiring diligent maintenance. The 586 tends to be slightly more affordable than the 686.
The 686: The Stainless Steel Champion
The 686, crafted with a stainless steel frame, offers superior corrosion resistance. This can be a major advantage in harsh or humid environments. The stainless steel finish is also very durable. The 686 may come at a higher price point compared to the 586.
Finding the Perfect Fit
Planning Your Role: Intended Purpose
Consider your intended use for the revolver. If you primarily plan to use it for self-defense, a compact, easily concealed barrel length might be best. For target shooting, a longer barrel and adjustable sights can enhance accuracy. Consider where it might be stored and the conditions in which it will be used.
The Budget’s Influence
The budget is also an essential factor. The 586 is often found at a slightly lower price point than the 686. The cost of ammunition should also be included in the budget.
The Personal Touch: Individual Preferences
Consider your personal preferences. Do you prefer the classic blued steel look of the 586 or the modern look and superior corrosion resistance of the 686? Do you have a strong preference for ease of maintenance? All of this can shape your decision.
Making the Right Choice
If you value a classic aesthetic and don’t mind the need for a little extra care, the 586 is an excellent choice. If corrosion resistance, durability, and ease of maintenance are a higher priority, the 686 may be the better option.
In Conclusion: A Timeless Rivalry
The Smith and Wesson 586 Vs 686 comparison showcases two exceptional revolvers that have earned their place in firearm history. Both offer outstanding performance, reliability, and accuracy. The 586 and the 686 are symbols of excellence in the world of revolvers. They are legacies of fine engineering.
Whether you are a seasoned shooter, a new gun owner, or a collector, both revolvers are excellent choices. They will both provide years of reliable service and shooting enjoyment. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your needs, budget, and personal preferences. Research both firearms further. Visit a local gun shop, handle both guns, and make an informed decision. And once you own one, enjoy it!
