The Genesis of the RAS47: An American AK
The AK-47. The name conjures images of conflict, resilience, and global reach. It’s a weapon synonymous with reliability, a symbol of defiance, and a firearm with a storied past. But, not all AKs are created equal. The Century Arms RAS47 has found its place in this lineage, and it is about to undergo a thorough examination to find out if it is truly a worthy addition to the AK-47 family. This review will delve deep, exploring its design, performance, and build quality, ultimately answering the crucial question: Is the Century Arms RAS47 a risk worth taking for the modern shooter?
The RAS47, a rifle manufactured by Century Arms, represents a readily available and relatively affordable entry point into the world of AK-pattern rifles. Its design attempts to capture the iconic features of the AK-47 while being manufactured primarily in the United States. This review aims to move past the superficial and delve into the substance, analyzing the RAS47 from every angle.
Century Arms has established itself as a prominent player in the firearms market, known for importing and manufacturing a diverse range of weapons, including AK-47 variants. The RAS47 emerged as an attempt to produce an American-made AK platform. This means that most of the parts, although they may have come from various sources initially, are assembled in the United States. The RAS47 aims to deliver the AK-47 experience without the need for significant importing, and usually with a price tag that reflects its domestically-produced components. The concept of the RAS47 seems straightforward: take the legendary AK-47 design and adapt it for the modern market. However, the execution of that concept has been a source of much debate.
The foundational features of the RAS47 are recognizable. It typically includes a stamped steel receiver, a common choice for AK-47 designs, that helps keep manufacturing costs down. It also features a standard AK-47 barrel length and twist rate, often chambered in 7.62x39mm, the ubiquitous round for AKs. The RAS47 is usually fitted with standard iron sights, a familiar sight for AK enthusiasts. The furniture, typically including a handguard, stock, and pistol grip, can vary, but the core elements stay true to the AK-47’s signature look.
Dissecting the Design: A Closer Look at the RAS47’s Anatomy
Let’s examine the RAS47 more closely. The heart of any AK is its receiver, and the RAS47 utilizes a stamped steel receiver. While this is a common AK design feature, it often raises questions about overall durability compared to milled receivers.
Moving on, the barrel is another crucial element. While we’re able to offer generalities like the barrel length and twist rate, the specifics can vary depending on the exact model and manufacturing runs. The chrome lining of the barrel can also be a point of contention, as some shooters value the chrome lining for its corrosion resistance, whereas others may see it as a point of compromise.
The bolt and bolt carrier are the workhorses of the AK system, responsible for cycling rounds, extracting spent casings, and chambering new rounds. The quality of these components directly impacts the rifle’s reliability.
Lastly, the furniture deserves attention. From the handguard and stock to the pistol grip, the materials and ergonomics impact the overall feel and handling.
There are strengths and weaknesses associated with the design choices of the RAS47. For example, the stamped receiver can make the rifle more accessible due to the lower cost of manufacturing. However, the quality of the receiver and the quality of the components used in the receiver can often be questioned.
On the Range: Evaluating Performance
The real test of any firearm happens on the range. This review’s performance evaluation involved an examination of accuracy, reliability, and handling. The following procedures were followed:
The ammunition used during testing varied to evaluate the RAS47’s performance with different loads. A variety of 7.62x39mm ammunition from different manufacturers and with different bullet weights was used to test for reliability and accuracy.
Accuracy testing involved shooting groups at various distances to assess the rifle’s precision. Targets were used to assess group size and point of impact. Results are given as an average of various groups shot.
Reliability was tested over several hundred rounds, observing for any malfunctions. Types of malfunctions were noted.
Handling and recoil were also evaluated to determine comfort and manageability.
Accuracy and Precision
The RAS47’s accuracy capabilities, when assessed, are generally moderate. The rifle is more accurate than some AK platforms, but less accurate than others. This result, as you might imagine, can vary depending on the shooter’s skill, the ammunition used, and environmental conditions. However, it is more important that the average is found, which is less than stellar. It’s best suited for close-quarters engagements rather than long-range precision shooting.
Reliability Challenges: A Persistent Concern
Reliability is where the RAS47’s reputation has been most severely challenged. Numerous reports and documented instances of malfunctions, including failures to feed and extract, have surfaced. The most serious and well-documented issue is the potential for bolt lug failures. These failures can cause the bolt to shear off, rendering the rifle inoperable and, potentially, dangerous. Some users, during the test, noticed issues in the ejection of spent rounds. While these issues may not be common, they still indicate the overall risk.
Recoil, Handling, and Ergonomics
The recoil of the RAS47 is typical for an AK-47, although the design of the stock and the overall weight of the rifle play a role in how it feels. The furniture’s ergonomics are subjective and can affect the overall comfort level. Some shooters may find the stock too short or the handguard uncomfortable. The rifle’s maneuverability is generally acceptable, but the overall weight can affect its quick handling.
The Build Quality: A Mixed Bag
The assessment of the RAS47’s build quality is essential for providing an objective review.
The receiver is the backbone of the firearm. The quality of the stamped steel receiver and how it is assembled is paramount. The steel’s thickness, the welding quality (if any), and the overall finish all influence the receiver’s durability.
The barrel’s materials and its overall quality also warrant close scrutiny. The rifling, which imparts spin to the bullet for accuracy, must be well-executed.
The bolt and bolt carrier, as previously mentioned, play a critical role in reliability. Their quality, from the materials used to the heat treatment, affects their service life and ability to withstand the pressures of firing.
The other components, like the furniture, sights, and trigger assembly, also impact the overall user experience. Their fit and finish, as well as their durability, add to the quality assessment.
Safety Concerns: A Critical Assessment
The RAS47’s troubled history is not easily dismissed. The documented instances of bolt lug failures represent a serious safety risk. The bolt lugs are the parts of the bolt that engage the locking recesses in the receiver, and if they fail, the rifle can suffer a catastrophic malfunction.
The manufacturing process is, as such, a key point of the debate surrounding the RAS47. Century Arms’ production methods have come under scrutiny. It’s important to note that not all American-made firearms are inherently superior.
The Good and the Bad: Weighing the Pros and Cons
- Pros: The RAS47 offers a more accessible entry point into AK-style rifles, and its availability is generally widespread. Furthermore, the rifle is often offered at a more attractive price point. The aesthetics of the rifle are often appealing to those looking for the classic AK look.
- Cons: The most significant drawback is the potential for reliability issues and safety concerns. The build quality often lacks the precision and attention to detail found in other AK platforms.
Comparisons and Alternatives
When evaluating the RAS47, it’s essential to compare it to other AK-47 variants. Rifles like the WASR-10 and some Arsenal AKs are renowned for their reliability and build quality. The WASR-10 often offers a better value proposition, while Arsenal rifles offer a higher level of fit and finish. Comparing the RAS47’s price point against its competitors, you will quickly come to the realization that a better quality and reliable AK can be obtained.
Value and the Final Verdict
Does the Century Arms RAS47 offer value? That depends. The price point can be tempting, but it must be weighed against the risks. The cost savings may not be worth the potential reliability issues and the lack of quality control. This rifle may be a suitable choice for some individuals, but given the potential risks, it’s more recommended for those who are looking for reliability. The RAS47 isn’t the best option.
The potential for catastrophic failures and the mixed build quality make it difficult to endorse.
Conclusion: A Final Assessment
The Century Arms RAS47, while offering an accessible entry into the AK-47 platform, carries significant risks that cannot be ignored. Its performance is inconsistent, the build quality is questionable, and the potential for serious malfunctions is a serious concern. While the price point might initially seem appealing, it’s vital to consider the long-term investment, safety, and peace of mind offered by more reliable and well-regarded alternatives. If you’re seeking an AK-47, explore other options.
Ultimately, the RAS47’s legacy is mired in controversy, and for good reason. The RAS47’s reliability has many wondering if it’s a risk worth taking. The answer, for most shooters, is no.
